Three federal judges grilled lawyers from the Justice Department and Washington state as they considered whether to lift a US-wide block on President Donald Trump's travel ban.
John Smith: fake news
rastin Kosha: Dishonest people have the power. Such a disgrace. Why it's not possible to impeach this administration?
What is the red line? Where is the border?
Mulinaster: For f's sake you stupid activist judges... let Trump do WHAT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ELECTED HIM TO DO. You're leaving people's lives hanging in the balance by delaying this ruling and it's very, very simple. The longer you delay this, the more people are going to be hurt at the other end when they realize that, after getting false hopes up, they won't be able to come to this country after all and are hurt even more than they would have been with a more logical, instant ban as was attempted but stifled by knee-jerk reactionaries.
The only error Trump made was not realizing how stupid people are in realizing that he was trying to save people a lot of pain by making this a quick shot in the arm rather than prolonging it and leaving ambiguity to peoples' fates.
Michael Miller: Looking forward to seeing these judges ruling against Trump's travel ban!
Killercroc: Can someone explain to me why he didn't ban countries like Saudi Arabia and Egypt?? Like I get the ban and why it's in place but none of the countries he picked actually have people that have committed terrorism in the US.
DB Donovan: Only Federal (liberal ass clown) Judges would ask stupid questions. Yes. Trump, as President has the power to enforce USC 1182, without question. The National Defense Authorization Act gives POTUS that power & YES, Donald J Trump is the REAL President of the United States, you stupid dishwads.
Mr Wheels: Islam is the antithesis of the US Constitution. It is a foreign Theocracy is NOT subject to protection in the USA.
Scott Rance: For starters AP fact checked the judge in Washington State James Robert and he spouted "alternative facts" on this case to begin with. You ca read about that here. below.
Secondly this is merely a ploy to stop the Trump administration from getting anything done and doing anything helpful for the American people. The democrat Party, members of the Republic party and Globalist backers are behind it and bank rolled by George Soros and companies like google. There's many articles about that you can read. Sift threw Zero Hedge and Global research articles as a starting point if you want. David Brock (a Soros puppet even has a memo on how to do this for the next for years.
Third Trump is well within his right to do this. Other than the obvious facts that have been mentioned by many I ask you leftists this. Are any of you planning on going to muslim countries in the middle east to protest against them for taking Muslim refugees before Christian? Because if you think this is wrong you better head straight over there and protest that action or your virtue signaling holds no water. Any of you leftists been paying attention to what is going on in Europe? Funny how 55% of europeans agree with the decision Trump made. It's funny how they would know more about the culture clashes and other issues surrounding this. They've only been living with it for 2 years now. Here's an article on that.
tableshaper: GO TRUMP! KEEP UP THE EXCELLENT WORK!
The watchmans eyes: Cubans came here and not one made a terrorist attack. Mexicans don't hide bombs in their ass. The seven countries temporarily banned is for out protection.
betterdays when: Any blood spilled in the country now is on democrats liberals & CNNs hands.
Mister X: Can we ban CNN? Hmmmmm
FATEd Pondera: Honestly, this is treason. The president has the full authority to do this under the Immigration and Nationality act of 1952. And even if he didn't, why is a stink being thrown over this now and not when Obama did it TWICE in 2011 and 13? Can someone explain that to me?
ApAcHe 247: Keep them the F*ck out.
Sam: "Court Weighs The Orange Cosby's Retarded Muslin Ban"
Ned Thumberland: The lie a.k.a. "alternative fact": Obama created the list of the 7 countries. Trump is just using Obama's list. So, Trump's travel ban is just like Obama's travel ban.
The truth: The Obama-signed law contains provisions that restrict travel to the United States for people who lived in or visited Iran, Iraq, Sudan, or Syria since March 2011. According to the law, they must have a visa to enter the United States; they can’t use what is known as the Visa Waiver Program, which allows 90-day U.S. visits to other foreign visitors. So, the law Obama signed did NOT ban anyone from Iran, Iraq, Sudan, or Syria from visiting the U.S.; it simply required that those visitors have visas.
The law was soon expanded by Obama’s Department of Homeland Security to cover Libya, Somalia, and Yemen. They were identified in the agency’s announcement as "countries of concern," a phrase used in the law.
Daveed Gartenstein-Ross, a senior fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, told us Priebus’ claim is not misleading, but that the law Obama signed doesn’t define the seven countries as the most dangerous in terms of harboring terrorists.
Also, if Trump simply created "the same" ban as Obama's, why not just keep Obama's travel ban in place?
rick grimes: CNN IS A DIRTY CANCER ON SOCIETY.
Chucky Justice: Did any of these cucks read the executive order?
John Deere: You can see the disdain for President Trump based on the CNN title for this video. It is proper to add his title in front of his name even if you don't like him. But the video should have been titled: Leftist 9th Circuit Court dismisses the law and goes rouge over President Trump's temporary travel restriction.
Video on this topic
U.S. Appeals Court Examines President Donald Trump's Travel Ban | TIME
Legal challenges to President Donald Trump's temporary travel ban on people from some Muslim-majority countries heat up again when two U.S. appeals courts ...
Both sides grilled as US appeals court probes Trump travel ban
An American appeals court ended Tuesday's session saying it would rule as soon as possible on whether President Trump's travel ban on refugees and ...
Federal appeals court affirms stay on Trump's travel ban
A three-judge panel from the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Thursday that a temporary block of President Trump's travel ban can stay in place.
Trump Travel Ban at Mercy of Appeals Court Judges
Feb.08 -- The Trump administration argued its case in support of reinstating a travel ban from seven Muslim-majority nations during questioning by appeals court ...
Appeals Court Weighs Trump Immigration Ban
On Monday, The fight over President Donald Trump's travel and refugee ban continued with the potential of going before the Supreme Court. temporarily ...
Explaining Trump’s travel ban appeals court arguments
President Trump's travel ban got its first federal appeals court review today, marking the biggest test yet for the revised executive order to suspend travel to the ...
What motivated Trump's travel ban? Supreme Court weighs relevance of campaign statements
In arguments over President Trump's travel ban, Supreme Court justices were concerned with questions of the president's authority and whether it was his ...
Appeals court weighs judge's block on travel ban
A federal appeals court is considering whether uphold a judge's ruling that blocked President Trump's travel ban. Oral arguments will be on Tuesday.
Appeals court weighs Trump's travel ban
Three federal judges grilled lawyers from the Justice Department and Washington state as they considered whether to lift a US-wide block on President Donald ...